There is no question that we have a problem with ideology in psychology—in all of science, actually. Our work is infused with it. Although it has been a longstanding problem that people have highlighted repeatedly, awareness of the problem has certainly increased in the last couple of years.
Saying everyone has an ideology is like stating water is wet. It is a nonsensical obfuscation. The systemic ideology is clearly a combination of underlying Marxist ideology with elements such as structural determinism (ethereal boogeyman, nobody is directly influencing but controls every aspect of everybody at all times), and postmodern philosophy (i.e., there is no way to know objective truth so we should say anything we want because everything is power dynamics and words is how to manipulate the system). This is not science, this is Lysenkoism. This ideology that you and others favor has a track record for humanity and it is dumbfounding that people would prefer to ignore that to feel personally anointed.
Regarding MLK: "It is the key phrase from King that supports a colorblind ideology."
Why did he say it to over 250,000 people on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial?
Did he not choose his words carefully? Seems unlikely. Seems to me like a great speech, with words chosen very, very deliberately.
Saying everyone has an ideology is like stating water is wet. It is a nonsensical obfuscation. The systemic ideology is clearly a combination of underlying Marxist ideology with elements such as structural determinism (ethereal boogeyman, nobody is directly influencing but controls every aspect of everybody at all times), and postmodern philosophy (i.e., there is no way to know objective truth so we should say anything we want because everything is power dynamics and words is how to manipulate the system). This is not science, this is Lysenkoism. This ideology that you and others favor has a track record for humanity and it is dumbfounding that people would prefer to ignore that to feel personally anointed.